Type title here

LeapForward Training Resource Toolkit LeapForward Learning for Practice: Feedforward for effective transition to the workplace 2 Introduction This document is not intended for projection, but rather to support LeapForward training packages. The references included in this resource toolkit and the subsequent summary of each theoretical framework, practical aid, guide or model, are intended to supplement the LeapForward training packages (as detailed below). Staff are invited to review these references to enhance their understanding of the theoretical background of the subject of feedback (and feedforward), and to apply this to assist and support in any developmental activities they may engage in with colleagues or students. Resources are organised to correspond with Workshops are follows: Workshop 1: Understanding feedback Workshop 2: Practicalities of workplace feedback Workshop 3: Emotional and relational aspects of workplace feedback Legend Each item is presented as follows: Diagram with source Description of framework, model or practical aid, including principles of operation Key points, showing how the example links to other work

References LeapForward Project: Toolkit Contents 1. Understanding feedback Formative Feedback model & seven principles of effective feedback: Nicol & McFarlane (2006) Feedback Model: Hattie & Timperley (2007) Feedback Dialogue: Boud & Molloy (2013) Students feedback seeking behaviour: Bok et al (2013) Responsibility-sharing in feedback in HE: Nash & Winstone (2017) Student Feedback Literacy: Carless & Boud (2018) 2. Practicalities of workplace feedback Endes Principles (1983) Pendletons Rules (1984) ALOBA: Agenda Led Outcomes Based Approach (1996) SET-GO (2004) Frame-based Feedback (2013) R2C2 facilitated feedback model (2015) Reflective Conversation model CORBS Critical Response Process Sandwich 3. Emotional and relational aspects of feedback Mindset: Dweck (2012). Thanks for the Feedback: Stone and Heen (2015) 3 4

1. Understanding feedback Formative feedback model & seven principles of effective feedback: Nicol & McFarlane (2006) Feedback model: Hattie & Timperley (2007) Feedback dialogue: Boud & Molloy (2013) Students feedback seeking behaviour: Bok et al (2013) Responsibility-sharing in feedback in HE: Nash & Winstone (2017) Student feedback literacy: Carless & Boud (2018) Formative feedback model & seven principles of good feedback practice: Nicol & MacFarlane-Dick (2006) Description A conceptual model of self-regulated learning and the feedback principles that support and develop self-regulation in students. Principles: 1.Clarify what good performance is 2.Facilitate self-development 3.Deliver high quality feedback information 4.Encourage teacher and peer dialogue 5.Encourage positive motivation and self esteem 6.Provide opportunities to close the gap 7.Use feedback to improve teaching Key Points Makes reference to students motivational beliefs & goal setting Identifies importance of self-regulation References Nicol, D.J & MacFarlane-Dick (2006) Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, 199-218 5 Feedback Model: Hattie & Timperley (2007) Description The purpose of feedback in this model is to close the gap or reduce discrepancies between the current level of performance or understanding and

the desired goal. Key Points The gaps or discrepancies can be closed or reduced by students or teachers The model works on 4 levels, although the it is recommended that the fourth level, SelfLevel is avoided; Process & Self-Regulation used together can provide more powerful, deeper learning Students can put in more effort, use more effective strategies, or modify their goals & self-regulation is encouraged Teachers can provide learning opportunities and challenging goals and can support students with learning strategies References Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, 81-112 6 Feedback Dialogue: Boud & Molloy (2013) Selfassessment Knowledge of expected standards External inputs (staff, peers)

FEEDBACK DIALOGUE a collaborative approach to learning Feedbackseeking behaviour adapted from Boud and Molloy 2013 References contd Ajjawi, R & Boud D (2018) Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 0:0, pages 1-14 Description Model which suggests that dialogue between learners & teachers provides the most useful feedback opportunities Key Points Positions the learner as a key driver of effective feedback processes and suggests that learners or students need to develop feedback-seeking behaviours Recognises that dialogue between learners and teachers provides a collaborative partnership approach to learning Recognises that feedback is a relational activity and that there must be trust and respect for the process to work well References Molloy, E & Boud, D (2013) Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Medical Education 47(3): 227-229, 2013 Boud, D & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6),

698-712. Feedback in higher and professional education: understanding it & doing it well (2013) Eds Boud, D. & Molloy, E., New York: Routledge 7 Students feedback-seeking behaviour: Bok et al (2013) Description Model of feedback which seeks to explain student behaviour surrounding feedback based on a consideration of personal & interpersonal factors, influencing factors and the resultant feedback seeking behaviours. Considers the cost-benefit of students seeking feedback in the clinical workplace References Bok, H, Teunissen, P, Spruijt, A, Fokkema, J, van Beukelen, P, Jaarsma, D, & van der Vleuten, C (2013) Clarifying students feedback seekingbehaviour in clinical clerkships Medical Education 47: 282-291 Bok, H., Jaarsma, D., Spruijt, A., Van Beukelen, P., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Teunissen, P. (2016). Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Medical Teacher, 38(1), 88-95 Key Points Intentions, characteristics and behaviours of students are addressed as part of the equation as is self-image and self-identity Goal setting is seen as relevant to the feedback process The source of the feedback is relevant in terms of it being someone who is trusted and whose feedback is valued and respected Seeks to explain student behaviour within clinical context with reference to Mindsets (Dweck), Relationships and Emotions Takes the view that receiver & giver have a role to

play in effective feedback processes 8 Responsibility-sharing in giving and receiving feedback in HE: Nash & Winstone (2017) Description FIG 1 Distributions of responsibility for tackling barriers to proactive recipience. References Nash, R. & Winstone, N. (2017) Responsibility sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback Frontiers in Psychology, 01 September 2017, Vol.8 Winstone, N. et al (2017) It'd be useful, but I wouldn't use it: barriers to university students feedback seeking and recipience, Studies in Higher Education, 42:11, 2026-2041 Based on a qualitative study which identified four broad kinds of psychological barrier to students engaging with and using feedback: Awareness: students cannot understand it or know what its for, or do not even realise theyve received feedback Cognisance: students lack knowledge of opportunities available for them to implement their feedback effectively Agency: students feel insufficiently equipped to deal with feedback, believing skills or qualities they are advised to develop are fixed, rather than modifiable through effort Volition: students simply lack motivation to engage with feedback, being unprepared to invest time or effort Key Points

Responsibility for effective feedback dialogue is shared between student and educator Connections with Mindsets (Dweck), motives and motivation, and cost-benefit of seeking feedback (Bok et al, 2013) 9 Developing student feedback literacy: Carless & Boud (2018) Description Four inter-related features are proposed as a framework underpinning students feedback literacy: appreciating feedback; making judgments; managing affect; and taking action Key Points Feedback literate students have understanding of and appreciate the role of feedback in improving work; have developed capacities to make sound academic judgements; and managing the affective aspects of feedback Crucially, feedback literate students develop a range of strategies for acting on feedback Teachers are identified as playing important facilitating roles in promoting student feedback literacy through curriculum design, guidance and coaching. References Figure 1. Features of student feedback literacy Carless, D, & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1315-1325

10 2. Practicalities of workplace feedback Endes Principles (1983) Pendletons Rules (1984) ALOBA: Agenda Led Outcomes Based Approach (1996) SET-GO (2004) Frame-based Feedback (2013) R2C2 facilitated feedback model (2015) Reflective Conversation model CORBS Critical Response Process Sandwich 11 12 Endes Principles (1983) Description Feedback should be: Undertaken with teacher & trainee as allies working towards common goal Expected At a mutually agreed time & place Close in time to episode on which it is sought Based on specific behaviour rather than general performance and should have been ideally observed at first hand

Given in small quantities and limited to remedial behaviours Descriptive, non-evaluative and nonjudgemental Composed of subjective data, which should be labelled as such Given on decisions and actions and not on ones' interpretations of student motives A set of guiding principles designed to enable feedback to be constructive, balanced, behavioural and useful Key Points Gives due consideration to time and place of feedback session (close to the action) Recommends feedback should be based on observable behaviours (ideally observed at first hand) Pays attention to what is manageable in terms of quantity and timings of feedback Limits feedback to remedial behaviours and does not attempt to interpret student motives References Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education JAMA 1983; 250:77781 Ende et al, Measuring patients desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4:23 30 Pendletons Rules for feedback (1984) 13

Description 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Clarify any points of information/fact Ask the learner what s/he did well ensure that they identify the strengths of the performance and do not stray into weaknesses. Discuss what went well, adding your own observations (if there is a group observing the performance, ask the group what went well; again, keep them to the strengths. Ask the learner to say what went less well and what they would do differently next time. Discuss what went less well, adding your own observations and recommendations (if there is a group observing the performance, ask the group to add their observations and recommendations). Pendleton's rules a set of guidelines for conducting feedback which can apply to group or individual feedback on performance observed at first hand or on video. Reflective conversations models build on these guidelines. Provides a safe structure or environment for learner Usable for 1:1 and group feedback Forces learner to give strengths first, however, the opportunity for interactive discussion of topics relevant to learner may be lost by following a rigid format Has elements of judgement attached

Expectations of students may be negative Key Points Rules may be overstating the fact that this is really only guidelines Forms the basis for reflective conversation models that additionally incorporate a planning stage References Pendleton D, Schofield T., Tate P., Havelock P. The Consultation: An Approach to Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984. ALOBA - Agenda-Led Outcome-Based Approach: Silverman, et al (1996) Agenda-Led, Outcome-Based Agenda-Led, Outcome-Based Approach (ALOBA) Approach (ALOBA) 1. Identify learners desired 1. Identify learners desired outcomes outcomes 2. Identify learners agenda 2. Identify agenda and 3. Encouragelearners self-assessment 3. Encouragesolving self-assessment and self-problem self-problem solving

4. Give balanced, descriptive 4. Give balanced, descriptive feedback feedback self- assessment and 5. Encourage 5. Encouragesolving self- assessment self-problem in responseand to self-problem solving in response to feedback feedback 6. Make offers and suggestions, 6. Make offers and suggestions, generate alternatives generate alternatives 7. Rehearse suggestions Rehearse suggestions 8.7.Be well-intentioned, valuing and 8. Be well-intentioned, valuing and supportive supportive 9. Opportunistically introduce new 9. Opportunistically

learning material introduce new material 10. learning Structure and summarise 10. Structure and summarise learning learning Description: A recommended approach to guide a productive and effective feedback session or dialogue. Key Points: Provides a safe environment for learner Useable for 1:1 and group feedback Has an element of judgement, attached which may be covert Expectations of students may be negative Identifies what learner wants help with, the discussion is directed towards achieving learner's goal References Silverman, Kurtz & Draper (1996) The CalgaryCambridge approach to communication skills teaching: Agenda-led, outcome-based analysis of the consultation. Educ Gen Pract , 4:288299 Chowdhury & Kalu (2004) Learning to give feedback in Medical Education Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, October 2004, Vol.6(4), pp.243-247 14

15 SET-GO: Chowdhury & Kalu (2004) SET-GO SET-GO What What II Saw Saw describing describing what what II saw saw What What Else Else did did you you see? see? What What happened happened next next What What do do you you Think? Think? Reflect Reflect back back to to the the learner learner What What Goals Goals were were you

you trying trying to to achieve achieve Any Any Offers Offers on on how how to to achieve achieve goals goals suggestions suggestions regarding regarding skills skills and and rehearsals rehearsals Description Simple aide-memoire for use in supporting and conducting observation-based feedback sessions. Built upon Pendletons Rules (1984) and ALOBA Approach (Silverman, et al, 1996), developed in clinical practice Key Points Observable behaviours & actions emphasised Self-reflection encouraged Goal-based learning encouraged References Chowdhury & Kalu (2004) Learning to give feedback in Medical Education Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, October 2004, Vol.6(4), pp.243247

Frame-based Feedback: Rudolph et al, (2013) Feedback Algorithm Description Step 1: Describe the problem from the instructors perspective Tell the trainee unambiguously and specifically what, from the instructors personal perspective, went wrong (or right) Key Points Three step process which encourages the teacher to consider the learners point of view (or frame of reference) and tailor instruction accordingly and diagnose both the what and the why of task failure Step 2: Diagnose the frames Ask questions to discover what cognitive frames drove the trainees Action Step 3: Teach to each to trainees frames Tailor instruction and discussion to the trainees frames Proposes an understanding of the learner- or students perspective of learning task Operates at a task and instructional level and aims to provide actionable feedback Feedback is correctional or remedial, with less emphasis on feedforward or improvement

References Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich W. (2008) Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Academic Emergency Medicine;15:11101116. Rudolph, J., Raemer, D., & Shapiro, J. (2013). We know what they did wrong, but not why : The case for frame based feedback. Clinical Teacher, 10(3), 186-189. 16 17 R2C2: Sargeant et al, (2015) Description A facilitated feedback model based on personcentred approaches; informed self-assessment and behaviour change foundations. Four phases: 1: Build rapport and relationship; explain the purpose of the assessment report and interview and learn about their context 2: Explore reactions to and perceptions of the data/report 3: Explore physician understanding of the content of the data/ report 4: Coach for performance change References Sargeant, J., et al (2015) Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2) Academic Medicine 15;90:16981706 Key Points: Facilitated model aims to engage recipients of feedback in self-reflection and deliberate conversation about performance (largely drawn from research in the clinical environment)

Takes a coaching approach (in line with personcentred and behaviour change foundations) 18 Reflective Conversations Model DESCRIBE Relevant, Observable Behaviours What Went Well/ What Went Less Well INVITE SELF ASSESSMENT CREATE ACTION PLAN Description Pragmatic approach to conducting a performance review or feedback meeting which relies on a dialogue between recipient and provider Key Points: Builds on Pendleton's Rules for feedback Identifies the importance of dialogue in the feedback process Self-assessment and self-reflection encouraged Connections with Carless and Boud (2018) taking Action and Sargeant et al, (2015) providing actionable guidance Outcome is a facilitated feedback session rather than a coaching conversation, but parallels between the two approaches NB: original source of model unclear 19 CORBS

Description A simple set of guidelines intended to ensure feedback is generally useful and effective C CLEAR O OWNED R REGULAR B BALANCED S SPECIFIC Key Points Aims to ensure feedback is balanced, timely and effective Makes no reference to respective roles and responsibilities (ownership is not specified), but provides generic indications of what a reasonable, practicable feedback process should cover References Maclean, S & Lloyd, I (2013) Developing Quality Practice Learning in Social Work: A Straightforward Guide for Practice Educators and Placement Supervisors NB: original source of acronym unclear 20

Critical Response Process: Lerman (2003) 4 stage process designed for use in Work in Progress Practice 1. Audience say what gave them meaning and why 2. Receiver (student) asks a specific question to focus on an aspect of the work 3. Giver (Peer, Tutor, or audience) asks a neutral question aimed at getting performer to reflect on an aspect 4. Giver (as above) offers a subjective opinion Description A suggested 4-stage framework which guides a critical reflection process with a group of participants in a creative, practical, work-in-progress practical activity. Key Points Provides opportunities for participants or audience to offer personal reactions to creative work Recognises audience, receiver and giver of feedback roles Allows for subjective views to be offered in an ordered or structured format References Liz Lerman (2003) Liz Lerman's Critical Response Process Lerman, L. (1984) Teaching Dance To Senior Adults. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas. 21 Feedback Sandwich Description The sandwich feedback method involves discussing

corrective feedback that is sandwiched between two layers of praise. Aims to be balanced through the provision of good and bad (or corrective) feedback References Von Bergen, Bressler, & Campbell (2014) The sandwich feedback method: Not very tasty Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business Volume 7 Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 199-207 Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 550-565 Key Points Positive feedback or praise may be ignored or discounted, if the negative feedback is perceived as the more useful; may be viewed as highly judgemental Does not suggest explicitly suggest improvements or necessarily enable actionable feedback Teacher-led (dialogue is not encouraged) Finishes with positive rather than negative NB: original source of menthod unclear 3. Emotional and relational aspects of feedback Dweck, C. (2012) Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. Robinson, London. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset : The new psychology of success. Random House, New York Dweck, C. (2000) Self theories: their role in motivation, personality and development Psychology Press, Hove Stone, D. and Heen, S. (2015) Thanks for the Feedback, Penguin 22

23 Mindset: Dweck, (2012) Description Two types of mindset: growth and fixed, which can apply to all aspects of life, including education. Mindset can determine what sort of feedback seeking approach an individual takes. Key points Learning goal orientation (Growth mindset): a desire to learn new skills, master new activities, understand new things Performance goal orientation (Fixed mindset): winning positive judgements of your competence and avoiding negative ones Individuals can change, chose, or modify the approach they take, or train themselves to adopt a learning goal orientation (growth mindset) Growth mindset held to be most useful for effective feedback seeking behaviour References Dweck, C. (2012) Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. Robinson, London. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset : The new psychology of success. Random House, New York Dweck, C. (2000) Self theories: their role in motivation, personality and development Psychology Press, Hove Science and art of receiving feedback well: Stone & Heen, (2015) Description Feedback is not a simple, scientific process but involves the management of feelings, emotions and relationships with

others in the process. Key points Aims to identify the key triggers that can help or hinder effective feedback recipience Truth triggers the feedback is wrong, unfair, unhelpful, blind spots Relationship triggers I cant hear this feedback from you Identity triggers the feedback is threatening and Im off balance Useful when identifying barriers and, by implication avoiding mistakes and engaging in better practice. Relates to Carless & Boud (2018) active management of affect (emotions & relationships) as part of effective feedback practice. Reference Stone, D. and Heen, S. (2015) Thanks for the Feedback, Penguin 24

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • XVII. VE XVIII. YZYILLARDA BLM XVII. ve XVIII.

    XVII. VE XVIII. YZYILLARDA BLM XVII. ve XVIII.

    Sebeplerin varacağı son nokta, onun ötesinde çok şey vardır. Yarış at için neyse; yalanlamak, inanmak ve şüphe etmek insan için odur. Pierre De Fermat (1601-1665) Bask kökenli Fransız hukukçu ve matematikçidir. Fermat amatör bir matematikçiydi.
  • 슬라이드 1 - Egloos

    슬라이드 1 - Egloos

    LEE, Nae Kyung. 19780919 이동훈A. LEE, Dong Hoon(A) 19700601 이문영 ... YOON, Hae Young. 20030128 19750423 이관훈. LEE, Kwan Hoon. 19690107 이근영 ...
  • Cosmological Perturbation in f(T) Gravity Revisited

    Cosmological Perturbation in f(T) Gravity Revisited

    Absence of the extra degrees of freedom at second order linear perturbation indicates that the theory is . highly nonlinear. Remark: Li . et al. already pointed out that extra degrees of freedom do not appear in linear perturbative analysis...
  • The Case of Sue Wilson

    The Case of Sue Wilson

    Sue is not confident in herself as a mother because she doesn't have the necessary resources to contribute to her family's resiliency. A resilient family and child are able to bounce back from hardships. Michael is secluded in a self...
  • Lecture Outlines Chapter 15 Environment: The Science behind

    Lecture Outlines Chapter 15 Environment: The Science behind

    = the soil is saturated with shallow standing water. Freshwater marshes = shallow water. Plants grow above the surface . Swamps = shallow water in forested areas. Can be made by beavers. Bogs = ponds covered in thick floating mats...
  • Place Title Here Board of Governors 13 February

    Place Title Here Board of Governors 13 February

    Place Title Here Board of Governors 13 February 2008 Robert Luke and Joy McKinnon Introduction What is applied research? ARO Update Accomplishments Presentation Student research team Agenda Problem pull vs. idea push, focusing on Solving problems Generating ideas for immediate...
  • Ti Active!! - Oame

    Ti Active!! - Oame

    Times New Roman Pulse Microsoft ClipArt Gallery Quadratic FUNction Aerobics How to play: A function will appear on the screen, and using your arms (and taking any necessary steps), you must show what the graph would look like. Eg.
  • This space is for the name and role of the speaker. A sans ...

    This space is for the name and role of the speaker. A sans ...

    Gareth Pickard Contracts Manager HiSparc Membership Agreement Presenting an outline of the draft: Thursday, 24th May 2012 No Livers! No Livers! Letter agreement Establishes the obligations and rights of the network Member and the University Provides a means of accession...