On Denoting and its history Harm Boukema Everyone agrees that the golden mountain does not exist is a true proposition. But it has, apparently, a subject, the golden mountain, and if this subject did not designate some object, the proposition would seem to be meaningless. Meinong inferred that there is a golden mountain, which is golden and a mountain, but does not exist. He even thought that the existent golden mountain is existent, but does not exist. This did not satisfy me, and the desire to avoid Meinongs unduly populous realm of being led me to the theory of descriptions. What was of importance in this theory was the discovery that, in analysing a significant sentence, one must not assume that each separate word or phrase has significance
on its own account. The golden mountain can be part of a significant sentence, but is not significant in isolation. It soon appeared that classsymbols could be treated like descriptions, i.e., as non-significant parts of significant sentences. This made it possible to see, in a general way, how a solution of the contradictions might be possible. My Mental Development (1944) In the belief that propositions must, in the last analysis, have a subject and predicate, Leibniz does not differ either from his predecessors or from his successors. Any philosophy which uses either substance or the Absolute will be found, on inspection, to depend on this belief. Kants belief in an unknowable thing-in-itself was largely due to the same theory. It cannot be denied, therefore, that the doctrine is important. Philosophers have differed, not so
much in respect of belief in its truth, as in respect of their consistency in carrying it out. In this latter respect, Leibniz deserves credit. The Philosophy of Leibniz (1900): Section 10 Idealism Aboutness of propositions restricted to single existents (substances) A proposition is true insofar as the predicate is in the subject Eventually all propositions are singular
Universals, relations, plurality, infinity, space and time are ideal. Russells realism Aboutness of propositions unrestricted Single subject not restricted to existents Being wider than existence Whatever has being can occur as subject of a singular proposition A is cannot be false A exists can be false (some similarity with Meinong) No in esse; the predicate is external
Two elementary types of non-singular propositions: Relational Combinational Jones is older Jones and Brown than Brown are two No infinity Infinity Denoting concept Universals, relations, plurality, infinity, space and time are real.
Next after subject-predicate propositions come two types of propositions which appear equally simple. These are the propositions in which a relation is asserted between two terms, and those in in which two terms are said to be two. The Principles of Mathematics (1903): 94 Indeed it may be said that the logical purpose which is served by the theory of denoting is, to enable propositions of finite complexity to deal with infinite classes of terms: this object is effected by all, any, and every, and if it were not effected, every general proposition about an infinite class would have to be infinitely complex. Now, for my
part, I see no possible way of deciding whether propositions of infinite complexity are possible or not; but this at least is clear, that all the propositions known to us (and, it would seem, all propositions that we can know) are of finite complexity. It is only by obtaining such propositions about infinite classes that we are enabled to deal with infinity; and it is a remarkable and fortunate fact that this method is successful. Thus the question whether or not there are infinite unities must be left unresolved; the only thing we can say, on this subject, is that no such unities occur in any department of human knowledge, and therefore none such are relevant to the foundation of mathematics. The Principles of Mathematics (1903): 141
The use of inverted commas may be explained as follows. When a concept has meaning and denotation, if we wish to say anything about the meaning, we must put it in an entity-position; but if we it itself in an entity-position, we shall be really speaking about the denotation, not the meaning, for that is always the case when a denoting complex is put in an entity-position. Thus in order to speak about the meaning, we must substitute for the meaning something which denotes the meaning. Hence the meanings of denoting complexes can only be approached by means of complexes which denote those meanings. This is what complexes in inverted commas are. If we say any man is denoting a complex, any man stands for the meaning of the complex any man, which is a denoting concept. But this is circular; fir we use any man in explaining
any man. And the circle is unavoidable. For if we say the meaning of any man, that will stand for the meaning of the denotation of any man, which is not what we want. On Fundamentals (1905): 35 It might be supposed that the whole matter could be simplified by introducing a relation of denoting: instead of all the complications about C and C, we might try to put x denotes y. But we want to be able to speak of what x denotes, and unfortunately what x denotes is a denoting complex. We might avoid this as follows: Let C be an unambiguously denoting complex (we may now drop the inverted commas); then we have (y): C denotes y: C denotes z.z.z=y
Then what is commonly expressed by C will be replaced by (y): C denotes y: C denotes z.z.z=y: y On Fundamentals (1905): 40 The most convenient view might seem to be to take everything and anything as primitive ideas, putting (x). x.=. (everything) (x). x.=. (anything). But it seems that on this view everything and anything are denoting concepts involving all the difficulties considered in 35-39, on account of which we adopted the theory of 40. We shall have to distinguish between everything and everything, i.e. we shall have: everything is not everything, but only one thing. Also we shall find that if we attempt to say
anything about the meaning of everything, we must do so by means of a denoting concept which denotes that meaning, and which must not contain that meaning occurring as entity, since when it occurs as entity it stands for its denotation, which is not what we want. These objections, to all appearance, are as fatal here as they were in regard to the. Thus it is better to find some other theory. On Fundamentals (1905): 44 The interesting and curious point is that, by driving denoting back and back as we have been doing, we get it all reduced to the one notion of any, from which I started at first. This one notion seems to be presupposed always, and to involve in itself all the difficulties on account of which we have rejected other denoting concepts. Thus we
are left with the task of concocting de novo a tenable theory of any, in which denoting is not used. The interesting point which we have a elicited above is that any is a genuinely more fundamental than other denoting concepts; they can be explained byit, but not it by them. And any itself is not fundamental in general, but only in the shape of anything. On fundamentals (1905): 47 The above gives a reduction of all propositions in which denoting phrases occur to forms in which no such phrases occur. Why it is imperative to effect such a reduction, the subsequent discussion will endeavour to show. The evidence for the above theory is derived from the
difficulties which seem unavoidable if we regard denoting phrases as standing for genuine constituents of the propositions in whose verbal expressions they occur. Of the possible theories which admit such constituents the simplest is that of Meinong. On Denoting (1905): p. 428 The interpretation of such phrases is a matter of considerable difficulty; indeed, it is very hard to frame any theory not susceptible of formal refutation. All the difficulties with which I am acquainted are met, so far as I can discover, by the theory which I am about to explain. On denoting (1905): p. 479
Of the many other consequences of the view I have been advocating, I will say nothing. I will only beg the reader not to make up his mind against the view as he might be tempted to do, on account of its apparently excessive complication until he has attempted to construct a theory of his own on the subject of denotation. This attempt, I believe, will convince him that, whatever the true theory may be, it cannot have such a simplicity as one might have expected beforehand. On Denoting (1905): p. 493 The relation of the meaning to the denotation involves certain rather curious difficulties, which seem in themselves sufficient to prove that the theory which leads to such difficulties must be wrong.
On Denoting (1905): p. 485 Thus all phrases (other than propositions) containing the word the (in the singular) are incomplete symbols: they have a meaning in the use, but not in isolation. For the author of Waverley cannot mean the same as Scott, or Scott is the author of Waverley would mean the same as Scott is Scott, which it plainly does not; nor can the author of Waverly mean anything other than Scott, or Scott is the author of Waverley would be false. Hence the author of Waverley means nothing. Principia Mathematica (1910) p. 67
Monaghan AJ, Morin CW, Steinhoff DF, Wilhelmi O, Hayden M, Quattrochi DA, Reiskind M, Lloyd AL, Smith K, Schmidt CA, Scalf PE, Ernst K. On the Seasonal Occurrence and Abundance of the Zika Virus Vector Mosquito Aedes Aegypti in the...
IPP -Individual Pathway Plan (Grades 7-12) using myBlueprint. Pathways. What is an IPP- Individual Pathway Plan ? WEB-BASED EDUCATIONAL PORTFOLIO. Start. ing in Grade 7, students . track . the growth and their career development competencies . and .
Other examples of Reading tools include text to speech software (e.g. Readplease.com, TextAloud MP3), handheld one word scanners or "reading pens"; book holders, MP3 players for listening to audio books, highlighters, magnification software, document readers, etc. * available in alternate...
Puritanism. 1560-1770. What is a Puritan? The Puritans were single-minded visionaries convinced of the rightness of their beliefs, but they were also practical and businesslike. ... The first and most famous group of the English Puritans landed in 1620, on...
Characteristics of Romanticism. 8. Romantic Escapism. Urban vs. Rural settings. The romantic journey is to the countryside. Cities= greed, poverty, and dehumanization (Industrial Revolution) Nature = escape, independence, moral clarity and purity
Quickly growing populations can be represented by a special line graph called a SIGMOID (S-shaped) curve. A (Lag phase)- the population has few individuals that are reproducing slowly at first. ... These factors rarely end a population, but takes them...
Its greatest single reason for failure as a transit unit is the fact that its engine speed must be maintained if its tractive effort and horsepower is, also, to be maintained. By contrast, maximum tractive effort, in the case of...
* In the context of scaling up and the global goal to provide universal access to HIV prevention, care and treatment services and in the era of the Three Ones-which calls for one harmonized HIV/AIDS M&E system- there is a...
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!