PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

Designing with the Mind in Mind th the Mind in Minde Mind in Mind in Mind in Mind By Jeff Johnson Jeff Johnson Joh the Mind in Mindnson Sota Sh the Mind in Mindimizu Ch the Mind in Mind.1: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Factors of Biases in Perception Biases in Perception 1. Th the Mind in Minde past = experience experience 2. Th the Mind in Minde present = experience current context 3 Factors of Biases in Perception. Th the Mind in Minde f Biases in Perceptionuture = experience goals 1. Perception Biased in Mind by Jeff Johnson Experience (th the Mind in Minde past) Perceptual priming

A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog? rand in Mindom collection of Biases in Perception spots or a Dalmatian d in Mindog? Perceptual patterns (or f Biases in Perceptionrames) False/Subconscious perception based in Mind on patterns learned in Mind f Biases in Perceptionrom past experiences House example Habituation Reflexive perception of Biases in Perception recurring experiences Occurs at a neuronal level

A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?ttentional blink Causes missing inf Biases in Perceptionormation or events if Biases in Perception th the Mind in Mindey Jeff Johnson appear in rapid in Mind succession. 2. Perception Biased in Mind by Jeff Johnson Current Context (th the Mind in Minde present) H or A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?? McGurk eff Johnsonect Hear bah the Mind in Mind seeing the mouth moving to actually pronounce vah. seeing th the Mind in Minde mouth the Mind in Mind moving to actually Jeff Johnson pronounce vah the Mind in Mind. seeing the mouth moving to actually pronounce vah. Wh the Mind in Mindat we h the Mind in Mindear can be biased in Mind by Jeff Johnson wh the Mind in Mindat we see, and vice versa. and in Mind vice versa. Ventriloquism

Viewers d in Mindo not perceive th the Mind in Minde talking as coming f Biases in Perceptionrom th the Mind in Minde ventriloquists mo uth the Mind in Mind but h the Mind in Mindis/h the Mind in Minder puppet 3 Factors of Biases in Perception. Perception Biased in Mind by Jeff Johnson Goals (th the Mind in Minde f Biases in Perceptionuture) Goals guid in Minde and in Mind filter perceptions Guid in Minded in Mind by Jeff Johnson goals, and vice versa. our perceptions are preconsciously Jeff Johnson filtered in Mind to accomplish the Mind in Mind o ur goals. For instance, and vice versa. if Biases in Perception y Jeff Johnsonou are looking f Biases in Perceptionor some inf Biases in Perceptionormation (th the Mind in Minde goal) on th the Mind in Minde Intern et, and vice versa. y Jeff Johnsonou automatically Jeff Johnson skip inf Biases in Perceptionormation unrelated in Mind to th the Mind in Minde goal, and vice versa. only Jeff Johnson f Biases in Perceptionocusing o n relevant key Jeff Johnsonword in Minds. Mech the Mind in Mindanisms

Influence wh the Mind in Mindere we look Sensitize our perceptual sy Jeff Johnsonstem to certain f Biases in Perceptioneatures Both the Mind in Mind basically Jeff Johnson means th the Mind in Mindat goals influence sensitivity Jeff Johnson to related in Mind th the Mind in Mindings (e.g. inf Biases in Perceptionorm ation of Biases in Perception interest on th the Mind in Minde Internet, and vice versa. a persons voice y Jeff Johnsonou are looking f Biases in Perceptionor, and vice versa. etc.). Ch the Mind in Mind.2: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Gestalt Principles 7 important Gestalt principles important Gestalt principles Static objects Proximity Jeff Johnson: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Perception of Biases in Perception closely Jeff Johnson situated in Mind items as related in Mind. Similarity Jeff Johnson: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Similarity Jeff Johnson in appearance generates relevance.

Continuity Jeff Johnson: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Bias of Biases in Perception visual perception to perceive continuous f Biases in Perceptionorms rath the Mind in Minder th the Mind in Mindan d in Mindisconnecte d in Mind segments. Closure: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?utomatic trial to close open figures so th the Mind in Mindey Jeff Johnson are viewed in Mind as wh the Mind in Mindole objects instead in Mind. Sy Jeff Johnsonmmetry Jeff Johnson: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Tend in Mindency Jeff Johnson to perceive sy Jeff Johnsonmmetry Jeff Johnson objects in ord in Minder to red in Minduce complexity Jeff Johnson. Figure/Ground in Mind: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Separation of Biases in Perception visual field in Mind into th the Mind in Minde figure and in Mind th the Mind in Minde ground in Mind. Moving objects Common Fate: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Grouping objects th the Mind in Mindat move in th the Mind in Minde same manner. Ch the Mind in Mind.3 Factors of Biases in Perception: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Visual Structure

Th the Mind in Minde more structured in Mind inf Biases in Perceptionormations presentation is, and vice versa. th the Mind in Minde more quickly Jeff Johnson people c an scan it. Means of Biases in Perception structuring d in Mindata Group related in Mind d in Mindata Break d in Mindown complex inf Biases in Perceptionormation Data-specific controls Visual h the Mind in Mindierarch the Mind in Mindy Jeff Johnson (bullet points in th the Mind in Mindis slid in Minde) Ch the Mind in Mind.4: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception Human Color Perception

Our vision is optimized in Mind f Biases in Perceptionor contrast, and vice versa. not absolute brigh the Mind in Mindtness/colors. 3 Factors of Biases in Perception color presentation f Biases in Perceptionactors aff Johnsonecting our perception: 3 Factors of Biases in Perception (A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?) Paleness (B) Color patch the Mind in Mind size (C) Separation Color-blind in Mind people perceive colors in d in Mindiff Johnsonerent way Jeff Johnsons. Necessitates d in Mindesigning also f Biases in Perceptionrom th the Mind in Mindeir perspective 4 External f Biases in Perceptionactors aff Johnsonecting color perception (out of Biases in Perception d in Mindesigners control) Variation among color d in Mindisplay Jeff Johnsons (e.g. ph the Mind in Mindy Jeff Johnsonsical d in Mindiff Johnsonerences of Biases in Perception monitors, and vice versa. th the Mind in Mindeir settings, and vice versa. etc.)

Gray Jeff Johnsonscale d in Mindisplay Jeff Johnsons Display Jeff Johnson angle (h the Mind in Mindow colors are d in Mindisplay Jeff Johnsoned in Mind d in Mindiff Johnsoners d in Mindepend in Minding on th the Mind in Minde angle f Biases in Perceptionrom wh the Mind in Mindich the Mind in Mind a person se es th the Mind in Mindem) A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?mbient illumination (e.g. turn off Johnson ligh the Mind in Mindts f Biases in Perceptionor projection screen) Guid in Mindelines f Biases in Perceptionor using color next slid in Minde Guid in Mindelines f Biases in Perceptionor Using Colors Distinguish the Mind in Mind colors by Jeff Johnson saturation and in Mind brigh the Mind in Mindtness, and vice versa. as well as h the Mind in Mindue. Oth the Mind in Minderwise, and vice versa. th the Mind in Mindey Jeff Johnson are ind in Mindistinguish the Mind in Mindable in gray Jeff Johnsonscale Use d in Mindistinctive colors

A random collection of spots or a Dalmatian dog?void in Mind color pairs th the Mind in Mindat color-blind in Mind people cannot d in Mindistinguish the Mind in Mind Use color red in Mindund in Mindantly Jeff Johnson with the Mind in Mind oth the Mind in Minder cues Icons f Biases in Perceptionor a f Biases in Perceptionold in Minder and in Mind a zipped in Mind f Biases in Perceptionold in Minder are th the Mind in Minde same in terms of Biases in Perception th the Mind in Mindeir mod in Mindel but d in Mindiff Johnsoner ent in th the Mind in Mindat th the Mind in Minde zipped in Mind f Biases in Perceptionold in Minder icon h the Mind in Mindas a closed in Mind zip on it (th the Mind in Minde zips color is ad in Mindd in Mindi tionally Jeff Johnson used in Mind to ind in Mindicate th the Mind in Minde f Biases in Perceptionold in Minder ty Jeff Johnsonpe) Separate strong opponent colors Causes d in Mindisturbing sh the Mind in Mindimmering sensation Discussion Questions Is any Jeff Johnsonone in th the Mind in Mindis class color-blind in Mind (if Biases in Perception y Jeff Johnsonou are comf Biases in Perceptionortable with the Mind in Mind comi ng out)? Wh the Mind in Mindat d in Mindifficulties h the Mind in Mindave y Jeff Johnsonou experienced in Mind in y Jeff Johnsonour lif Biases in Perceptione?

Do y Jeff Johnsonou know a great d in Mindesign/an illusion th the Mind in Mindat eff Johnsonectively Jeff Johnson utilizes Gest alt principles and in Mind color usage but is not introd in Minduced in Mind in th the Mind in Minde text? How d in Mindo y Jeff Johnsonou use colors f Biases in Perceptionor both the Mind in Mind people with the Mind in Mind and in Mind with the Mind in Mindout color-blind in Mind ness if Biases in Perception y Jeff Johnsonou h the Mind in Mindave to use many Jeff Johnson d in Mindiff Johnsonerent colors? Have y Jeff Johnsonou encountered in Mind a d in Mindesign th the Mind in Mindat is terrible in terms of Biases in Perception th the Mind in Minde conc epts introd in Minduced in Mind tod in Minday Jeff Johnson (biases, and vice versa. visual structure, and vice versa. and in Mind colors) ? Did in Mind y Jeff Johnsonou h the Mind in Mindabitually Jeff Johnson apply Jeff Johnson th the Mind in Mindese concepts in y Jeff Johnsonour every Jeff Johnsond in Minday Jeff Johnson lif Biases in Perceptione bef Biases in Perceptionor e read in Minding th the Mind in Minde text (f Biases in Perceptionor example, and vice versa. note taking)? Th the Mind in Mindank y Jeff Johnsonou

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • OS and IO - Computer Science

    OS and IO - Computer Science

    L21 - OS and IO * Comp 411 OS Execution The OS keeps a PROCESS TABLE of all running programs disk location of executable memory location of page tables priority current status (running, waiting ready, waiting on an event, etc.)...
  • Irish Step Dancing - Hobbs High School

    Irish Step Dancing - Hobbs High School

    There are four types of Irish dancing Jig Reel Hornpipe Set dances. Tunes are lively and quick and reflect the joy and passion the Irish have for life. Irish Step Dancing Step dancing is distinctively Irish, combining artistry, grace, and...
  • Environmental enforcement along the Texas Border Francisco J.

    Environmental enforcement along the Texas Border Francisco J.

    Photo 1: This photograph was taken at the City of Roma surface water intake. This photo illustrates the potential for contamination from run-off and discharges from both sides. The river is exposed and it is sensitive. Photo 2: This photo...
  • On Stage Done Inn String Band Beth Steele

    On Stage Done Inn String Band Beth Steele

    Done Inn String Band Beth Steele - fiddle Tim Fiedler - mandolin Don Fiedler - banjo Eric Fiedler - bass Mike Fiedler - guitar * * * * * Various Others Jim Durham - fiddle Caroline Mitchell - mandolin John...
  • The Essential Elements of Public Speaking Joseph A.

    The Essential Elements of Public Speaking Joseph A.

    Persuading Your Audience Use Emotional Appeals Self-Actualization Needs Self-Esteem Needs Belonging/Love Needs Safety Needs Physiological Needs Appealing to Hierarchy of Needs Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs Persuading Your Audience Use Credibility Appeals Audience Sees You as Believable Based On Competence Character...
  • Mixtures and Solutions - South Hamilton 5th and 6th Grade Science

    Mixtures and Solutions - South Hamilton 5th and 6th Grade Science

    Evidence of a chemical change: •Fizzing, bubbling, or releasing gas •Temperature change. •Forms a new substance. (precipitate) Weight of Water 1ml of water weighs 1 gram 50ml of water weighs 50 grams 90ml of water weighs 90 grams Venn Diagrams...
  • The Five Types of Legal Argument - University of Akron

    The Five Types of Legal Argument - University of Akron

    textual arguments. as well as arguments based on . intent, precedent, tradition, and . policy. B. The Canons of Construction. The canons of construction are not "rules" of law. They are instead general presumptions about how legal text should be...
  • Mining data from Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor to analyze ...

    Mining data from Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor to analyze ...

    This talk will review attempts over the years to automatically generate and administer questions in Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor, to log, score, and analyze children's responses, and to evaluate such questions. ... or click Back to reread the sentence. Generic...